This study evaluates the expectations of claimants regarding compulsory land acquisition and the effectiveness of the compensation process in Delta communities. A mixed-methods approach, combining descriptive and exploratory research, was employed. The study surveyed 128 practicing estate surveyors and valuers in Delta State, as well as 27 affected individuals, including women, youths, and farmers, through questionnaires and interviews. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for quantitative responses and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. The findings reveal significant disparities between the expectations of claimants and the realities of land acquisition and compensation. Timely and adequate compensation emerged as a primary concern, as insufficient payments, particularly for crop losses and livelihood impacts, exacerbate economic hardships. The diversity in demographic and occupational backgrounds influences compensation expectations, with younger individuals and farmers prioritizing the restoration of their livelihoods. Claimants expressed low confidence in grievance redress mechanisms, viewing legal processes as costly and ineffective. Additionally, while transparency in the compensation process is valued, it remains secondary to the necessity for financial adequacy. Key recommendations include implementing replacement cost valuation, enhancing grievance redress mechanisms, ensuring fair crop valuation, and increasing public participation in compensation decision-making. Addressing these gaps through legal and policy reforms can improve fairness in land acquisition and promote sustainable development in affected communities.